patching...
Breaking: Court Orders Recognition Of Out-Of-State Gay Marriages »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Online Petition Urges Maintenance of Senator Theatre

James "Buzz" Cusack, who manages the Art Deco Cinema, said the building was in "sad shape" when he took over operations in 2010.

 

Does the Senator Theatre need better maintenance?

Friends of the Senator Theatre, a group that has advocated for what it believes is best for the historic Art Deco cinema, has launched an online petition urging better maintenance of the Senator. 

“Baltimore's historic Senator Theatre (1939) is an iconic landmark, listed on the National Register of Historic Places, and it deserves to be enhanced, restored, and preserved in perpetuity. The Senator has been under new management for over a year, and it's become necessary to insist that the management perform professional routine maintenance on the building,” the online petition reads.

As of Friday afternoon, there were 345 signatures on the petition with a listed goal of 500 signatures.

On the Friends of the Senator Facebook page it lists Tom Harris and Laura Perkins as the group’s “officers.”  Perkins writes the blog AstroGirl’s Galaxy Guide and has been a consistent critic of the city and Baltimore Development Corporation’s handling of the Senator Theatre since taking the property from former owner Tom Kiefaber, and then leasing it to James “Buzz” Cusack and his daughter Kathleen Cusack.

In a message via Facebook Perkins wrote that residents from surrounding neighborhoods and businesses have been complaining about the maintenance of the theater.

In Perkins message she writes issues such as replacing light bulbs on the theater's marquee have spawned the petition requesting better maintenance. In her message she writes that Friends of the Senator Theatre donated 300 light bulbs in March to replace all the lights on the marquee once. But she said so far the theater's operators have not done so. 

"These issues have been raised by people in the local community, at community association meetings, and by members of the local business community. Many are concerned about the appearance of the theatre, which simply is not receiving routine maintenance," according to Perkins' message.

James "Buzz" Cusack, who owns the Charles Theater and manages the Senator Theatre, admitted that the building is in rough shape, but maintained it was in rough shape when they took control of the building more than a year ago.

“I guess the best thing that we can say is, it was in very sad when we got it, it’s in very sad shape now and will be in very sad shape until we can fix it up,” Cusack said. 

He also said there’s no current maintenance being done on the building because they are waiting for state funds and city approval to begin a rehab of the structure.

The renovations to the theater include plans to add more screens the single screen theater so it can compete against other theaters. 

Follow North Baltimore Patch at Facebook and Twitter.

Related Topics: Friends of the Senator Theatre, James "Buzz" Cusack, Senator Theatre, and Tom Kiefaber

Laura P

1:04 am on Saturday, December 3, 2011

I don't really understand Mr. Cusack's reasoning. There are $300 dollars worth of bulbs that were donated in March by Friends of The Senator, yet they have never been installed. What does it take to get up on a ladder and screw them into the sockets? That's just a matter of simple, day to day, maintenance. It does not require state approval or state funds.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Andrea

5:16 am on Saturday, December 3, 2011

I remember that Mr. Kiefaber said that there were wiring and fire hazard problems with the marquee dating from his time of ownership -- that his staff had to contantly visually watch for smoke. Maybe it's not as simple as just replacing bulbs.

Comment_arrow

Barbara

10:06 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011

That is correct Andrea. Right after they had a packed show of "Star Wars" the "Friends" pointed out that they had been running the theatre by their trained noses to sniff out any issues with the bad wiring. A big "oops" on their part.

Buzz Beeler

1:51 am on Saturday, December 3, 2011

A Baltimore Icon. How many great films premiered there? Even the one I wrote, which met a rather quick death.

A couple years later got chance to work with Tom and the 50th celebration of "It's A Wonderful Life."

We brought in all the surviving cast members, Zuzu, Frank Capra, Jr. and some others. Sold out that night. Not long after that Mr. Capra died from cancer.

Life is and was a little different from the movie, sad as it may be.

Reply

Buzz Beeler

11:05 am on Saturday, December 3, 2011

Andrea, my pitch to Capra about a script I had that my agent said he really liked did crash and burn. It was a spoof on his dads' classic "It's A Wonderful Life title "It's A Wonderful Life - Not!" The role of Clarence the angle was switched to a black angle name Claretta.

We got so close, but in the end Frank felt the heat might be too great for making fun of his dad's film. I sat next to him in the screening room which should have been a great experience, but in reality it was a huge let down.

Reply

Laura P

11:11 am on Saturday, December 3, 2011

Andrea, it is as simple as replacing bulbs. The landscaping in the back is as simple as cutting the grass. These are two of the things we are asking them to do in the petition, which haven't been done.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Andrea

11:55 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011

If anything about maintaining and restoring The Senator were "simple," Laura, your friend Mr. Kiefaber would not have lost it and the new operators would not be facing such a challenge. Reread what Mr. Kiefaber said about that marquee in his letter chastizing the Cusacks for leaving the lights on too long (lights on, lights out, they can't win with y'all) . Remember? You deleted my comments about it when you barred me from the FOTS FB page. I've posted it here several threads down for your convenience.

Buzz Beeler

11:20 am on Saturday, December 3, 2011

The government funds groups like CASA but yet on of the great sites that put Baltimore on the front pages for years is left to rot. That is the real crime.

Reply

Laura P

1:40 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011

Buzz Beeler, I hear you, but I respectfully disagree. The issue at this point is not funding by taxpayers. That is being done since the new operators took over, and more is apparently on the way. The issue is that the new operators are not doing basic maintenance, much of which requires little or no funding. This is an issue of basic theatre operation.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Buzz Beeler

10:54 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011

Laura, I have no clue as to the politics of this issue. I was just reminissing the good ole days and the memories I had being there.

IamGayle

2:05 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011

Time for the Cusacks to stop blaming others....

“I guess the best thing that we can say is, it was in very sad when we got it, it’s in very sad shape now and will be in very sad shape until we can fix it up,” Cusack said.

He also said there’s no current maintenance being done on the building because they are waiting for state funds and city approval to begin a rehab of the structure.

*If this is the best thing you say say Cusacks, you're best simply isn't good enough.*

Reply

glsever

2:06 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011

I think it makes pretty good business sense to avoid any additional expenses possible until the theater is renovated. After all the place is not going to make any money until the renovation is complete, so the Cusak's really have to operate on a pretty slim budget until then. However I would agree that cutting the grass out back should be done, just in the interest of being compliant with city ordinances. But the lightbulbs could probably wait... I'd be surprised if they even had a full time maintenance person on board yet...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Barbara

10:16 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011

It makes perfect business sense actually. These folks have boasted about how well they took care of the theatre under their operation, yet all they've admitted to is putting up bandaids to hide the problems. In 20 years of operation you would think Mr. Kiefaber would've made a little cash that would've been able to pay for the rewiring of the marquee. Rather than training his management staff on how to "sniff" for issues.

Wasn't it in 2007 when Mr. Kiefaber recieved $109k from citizens all over the WORLD? I want you to remember that figure, Anonymous, 109k, that's one hundred and nine thousand dollars that he reported receiving as a bailout which averted a foreclosure auction.

IamGayle

2:39 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011

How did we do it all those years?? They had access to volunteers, the bulbs are there. And no. They were not interested in hiring one person to maintain the theatre (as well as the neighborhood) as the previous maintenance had. Covering over the marquee in lieu of basic maintenance should not be an acceptable option.

Reply

Balt Observer

3:02 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011

It's not surprising that the lackeys of the previous regime of the Senator are back at work harrassing the new management. It's been well over a year now and they are still unable to accept that they no longer have any say in the operations of the theater. Hopefully this bizarre attempt at meddling in the affairs of a private business will not result in another outbreak of violence like that which resulted in a restraining order being placed on the previous owner.

Reply

Laura P

3:06 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011

@Anonymous, there were volunteers offering to help them replace the light bulbs. They have employees who were trained by the previous management that I'm sure know how to do it. As someone who lives in the immediate neighborhood and who has volunteered at the theatre, I'm well aware that the previous owner was often there doing this type of work himself, sometimes at 2 AM or 4 AM. There is no excuse for not replacing lightbulbs in working fixtures for a year. As historic theatre afficionados all over the country know, "The show begins on the sidewalk!"

Reply
Comment_arrow

Barbara

10:29 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011

Maybe they don't want to make things worse by attempting to "patch" things up. I think Mr. Cusack made his intentions very clear. The factof the matter is, the theatre is operating while plans are being finalized, which can be a long process ESPECIALLY with a building that is 70+ years old. I've had the pleasure of speaking with Mr. Cusack and he informed like he's informing anyone who actually asks him directly that the plan is to fix the issues, build the extra screens and have a grand reopening. Sounds like a perfect plan to me.

I'm glad I decided to post these comments on here where you can't delete them unlike on your facebook page where you simply delete the posts that you don't like. I've noticed that every time someone brings up a valid point the next day they are deleted and probably blocked. Perhaps a petition shoudl be started to shut down the FOTS facebook page for doing nothing but spreading rumours.

Laura P

3:19 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011

@Balt Observer: It's not a private business. It's a publicly owned historic building that the Cusacks have been gifted with a leasing cost of $1 a year.

Reply

Tom Kiefaber

7:06 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011

It was predicted that "infamous Andrea" would reemerge with an apologist post, attempting to divert this issue & in the process connect me with the controversial neglect of The Senator's formerly well-maintained exterior lighting. Well, sure enough, she's baaaaack.

Andrea's revealing post, skewed to the point of fraudulent conflation, relates to a Friends of the Senator (FOTS) post from over a year ago, noting that the new operators were leaving the exterior lights burning all night, with no one present. The FOTS group was attacked for raising a concern & I noted this was a dangerous practice, as the wiring shouldn't be energized all night with no one monitoring the irreplaceable historic facility, in case a short-circuit developed.

Andrea's post is unrelated to the cumulative deterioration of the entire array of exterior theatre lighting to such a degree that alarmed business & residential community members are signing the FOTS petition online at an astounding rate.

Visit: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/2/help-the-senator-theatre & read the varied insightful comments posted with the petition signatures. Sorry Andrea, but what's occurring is a telling indication that the new operators of the beloved, publicly-owned landmark Senator Theatre, paying $1 annually, are shamefully neglecting the responsibility they fought to achieve, as the new "skilled expert operators" chosen by the BDC.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Barbara

10:33 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011

Classic Kiefaber. Someone raises a valid point and he has to point out how the user has got to be on someone's payroll meant to discredit the FOTS. I find it funny how on your facebook page you claim to have only been approached by the FOTS regarding this petition, yet you are the second signature on it and have commented repeatedly on the topic. You guys have turned into that annoying group in the back of the theatre that everyone wishes would just shut up or leave.

Comment_arrow

Andrea

11:41 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Mr. Kiefaber, it is tempting not to bother. But as it seems to me that you are harassing the operators in yet a new way, I'll try to deflect you, since I have a civic interest and a belief in basic fairness. I've never met them and am no one's "apologist."
Gentle readers: Here are Mr. Kiefaber's own words about the marquee, from his FOTS Facebook post in July 2010. Based on this, if I were the Cusack's, I'd think twice about lighting the marquee at all. Mr. K wrote:
"After seven decades of daily use, the electrical wiring to and from and within the marquee has deteriorated to the point that the entire marquee, including the wiring, needs a full restoration; a costly endeavor that's prohibitive at this point in time. The marquee's aged status is one of the more risky elements, because the marquee framing is mostly 70 year old wood, coupled with deteriorated wiring. It is a situation that must be consistently monitored to prevent a full blown marquee fire.
The former management team was trained to be vigilant whenever the marquee was lit, noting irregularities such as blinking or flickering lights or any electrical smell related to possibly shorting wires. When this would occur on occasion, the marquee would be immediately turned off and the source of the problem investigated. That standard operating procedure has served to prevent major problems and has protected the iconic original marquee to date from destruction, until it can be fully rewired and restored."

Bart

7:18 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011

I find it curious that Baltimore City was so quick to allow the BDC to turn over the care of this historic site to the Cusaks who have just let it sit and rot. No matter how badly Tom Kiefaber was running things (according to them) at least the theatre was operating and being maintained. What a terribly stupid thing to do.

Reply

Barbara

10:21 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011

There is "patching up" - what you did for 20 years, and there is "fixing", which is what the current operators seem to want to do. They've only been there a year and have managed to strip the place down to expose the mess that kiefaber allowed happen under his 20 years of operation. At least these folks are honest and are not HIDING the terrible condition of the theatre.

A smart person who ''knows" (as you claim to do) that the new operators are going to fail woudl sit back, keep their mouths shut, and smile while they fail. NOT stand in front ofthe theatre every day grabbing everyone that walks by and points out a few burnt out light bulbs, Mr. Kiefaber. Of course, according to Maryland Judiciary Case Search, you're no longer allowed to go near the theatre. So you harass the surrounding businesses... by the way... you're not the only one who knows the owners of the surrounding businesses. Some of us do NOT appreciate you claiming to speak on our behalf!

Reply

IamGayle

10:37 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011

Barbara, what are you talking about? The theatre has not been maintained in the last year, nor do the Cusacks have any interest in rolling up their own sleeves. You are correct in that they are not hiding the current conditions. Everyone can see this. Who exactly are you referring to with regard to standing in front of the theatre every day and grabbing everyone that walks by pointing out a few burnt out bulbs? That's not being honest now is it Barbara?

Reply

IamGayle

10:39 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011

Add to this Barbara that it's also not honest of you to say that comments left on the FOTS page are deleted and some folks blocked from commenting. This is actually what the Cusacks have done on THEIR FB page. Let's stick to the facts and to the topic at hand Hon.

Reply

Tom Kiefaber

9:03 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Apparently a painful nerve of truth has been hit IamGayle. Big time. The real picture is emerging of The Senator's shamefully neglected exterior degradation, week in and out for over a year, has the few "team Cusack" apologists left freaking out in desperation. These few still attack me as the straw man distraction from what's really coming down for all to see, as it all comes unraveled. Anyone who does not live in the area, or run a business in the district that remains undecided should simply peruse the before & after images posted above, and/or click:
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/2/help-the-senator-theatre . The reality of what's up will quickly clarify.

The FOTS folks say they may soon need to move the goalposts downfield for the third time! ! since posting the petition online, Tuesday the 29th. The comments being posted from area residents, & from across the nation & Europe as well, paint an entirely different picture tan "Andrea', "Barbara" and 'Anonymous" post above. The literal darkness shrouding reality at The Senator Theatre is being quickly dispelled.

The BDC's mishandled transition to the type of non-profit, community-oriented arts organization required for "Baltimore's Premiere Showplace" to achieve its multi-purpose destiny, without need for yet another 1.5 million dollars in scarce taxpayer funds, is being revealed for what is; a ruse to install inept, unprofessional cronies to control the key parcel of real estate anchoring the commercial district.

Reply

Barbara

1:15 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011

I know that I was deleted, and I know of 2 others who have also been deleted for bringing up valid points. My guess is that the FOTS members are the ones that have been blocked by the cusacks, and judging by what everyone sees on your facebook page I can't blame them one bit.

And I am referring to all of you.

Reply
Comment_arrow

IamGayle

8:22 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Well then Barbara, it appears that you are the one spreading rumors.

Buzz Beeler

1:22 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Barbara, they don't delete unless you violate the terms of use. Read it carefully so you know the rules and you won't be deleted.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Balt Observer

1:43 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Barbara isn't talking about having comments deleted from Patch, she's talking about the Friends of the Senator group deleting comments that they don't approve of from their Facebook page.

Barbara

1:24 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Mr. Cusack himself is aware that the theatre is in bad shape and has shared his intentions. Did any of us take on the burden of keeping this theatre alive? I think we owe them whatever time they need to fix the issues that have been neglected for many years.

Posting before and after pictures claiming to not make it about cusack vs kiefaber? Please, you folks are pathetic.

Reply
Comment_arrow

IamGayle

8:24 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Who is responsible for maintaining the theatre under it's new ownership and operators?

Comment_arrow

IamGayle

2:22 pm on Monday, February 20, 2012

What business is it that you run in the neighborhood Barbara?

Barbara

1:25 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Buzz, I shared my opinion about joining the page and being dissapointed that they weren't posting information but rather negative nonsense about the new operators and they blocked me from posting again. I did not violate any conditions.

Reply
Comment_arrow

IamGayle

5:30 pm on Monday, December 5, 2011

Wrong again Babs. We have been posting information. And NOT negative nonsense. This along with your earlier comments above are, simply put... fabrications.

Buzz Beeler

9:59 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Barb, sorry if I got it wrong. I have had some issues on this site, but there were IT problems and not censorship. I have not know Patch to censure comments.

This issue is out of my league. I am not familiar with the various points of view to make constructive comments.

Reply

Laura P

12:41 pm on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Here is the undeniable crux of the matter, whether the Cusack cult wants to admit it or not: the theatre always looked gorgeous and stunning at night before, now, since the Cusacks have taken it over, it looks terrible, and the degradation has happened in only a year. The City spent $1.7 Million of taxpayer money in the past couple of years to acquire the theatre and get the Cusacks started on the project, and they have made the situation WORSE, not better.

There are nearly 400 people on that petition who apparently agree with that, many of whom have added their own comments going far beyond the criticism the petition text itself levels.

Reply

Balt Observer

12:54 pm on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Here is an undeniable fact - Kiefaber is an active instigator in a campaign to contact and harrass the Cusacks while there is a restraining order in effect against him prohibiting just such activities:

Court System:DISTRICT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY – CIVIL System
Case Number:0101SP068582011 Case Status:COMPLETE
Case Type:PEACE ORDER Order Valid Thru:01/21/2012
Filing Date:07/15/2011

Defendant Name:KIEFABER, THOMAS
City:SPARKS State:MD

Plaintiff Name:CUSACK, KATHLEEN C

Hearing Date:07/22/2011 Hearing Time:1:30 PM Room:X2
Hearing Location:1400 E. NORTH AVE,BALTIMORE,MD 21213-1400
Hearing Type:FINAL
Result: COURT ORDERS:
SHALL NOT ABUSE
SHALL NOT CONTACT
SHALL NOT ENTER RESIDENCE
SHALL STAY AWAY FROM EMPLOYMENT

I wonder if a judge might consider Kiefaber’s inducement of others to contact and harrass the Cusacks a violation of this restraining order.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Balt Observer

12:55 pm on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Here is the email that Kiefaber has been sending out inducing others to harrass the Cusacks:

“To Whom It May Concern:

The Friends of The Senator (FOTS) advocacy organization has asked that I assist their efforts to help disseminate an online petition to stop the alarming deterioration of the historic theatre.

The one-year honeymoon is apparently over for the new operators, who lease the facility for $1-a-year, from the City of Baltimore. I’ve agreed to assist the process, despite concerns that my participation will undoubtedly trigger some blowback of “sour grapes” on my part. Regardless, I agree with the FOTS group, as the neglect of the exterior maintenance in the past year has been alarming.

Please take a moment to click the link below to read and sign the FOTS Senator Theatre petition online. It’s a quick and easy process, and by signing onto the effort, you will help ensure the judicious preservation of the historic facility. After all, it’s The Senator, “Baltimore’s Premiere Showplace” !

Thank You.

Regards, Tom Kiefaber

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/2/help-the-senator-theatre/

“Protect the Irreplaceable”

Tom Kiefaber

4:50 pm on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Andrea, Your attempts to obfuscate & dissemble are quite obvious & oddly personal. What do my words about the theatre wiring from a year ago possibly have to do with the FACT, that the present operators have neglected to maintain all exterior lighting, under, behind, & above the Senator's once stunning, neon draped marquee & brightly illuminated facade? The answer: nothing at all whatsoever.

It's simply absurd to try & tar me with your illogical attempts to deflect the Senator lover's irate concern in my direction, a year down the road. it's clear that I have nothing to do with the awful spectacle the new operators are responsible for allowing The Senator's evening appearance to become. You're alone in persisting with this folly as a seemingly desperate apologist for the present operators. If not, what, & who are you "Andrea". What is your mean-spirited agenda here?

Take a moment & simply peruse the photos posted on above & assess the stark, reality of any pair of before & after operational change-over images you choose to view. They stand alone, & speak volumes in eliminating any confusion you're fixated on sowing on this site. It's simply a disgrace.

Over a year after I relinquished the privilege of operating The Senator, the FOTS folks, stymied behind-the-scenes in trying to quietly rectify this glaring problem, created an online petition on their own, & asked me to help disseminate it. I agreed to do so & the galvanized public reaction speaks for itself.

Reply

Barbara

1:18 pm on Sunday, December 4, 2011

How about this interesting fact. A facebook friend of mine has just messaged me regarding the petition. It turns out he signed the petition just to get a comment in supporting the theatre and it was never posted but his signature was counted. He was comment number #278. I checked the comments on the petition site and sure enough it jumps from #277 to #279. I also noticed that it happened again jumping from #287 to #289. #263 is missing as well. Very curious.

Reply

Tom Kiefaber

4:50 pm on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Barbara,

An online petition is not something you sign onto as a deceitful ruse, to then turn troll and attempt to refute the petition itself. If your "friend" ;-) wishes to do so, please suggest that the friend join you in this forum and simply follow your lead. There is absolutely nothing untoward for a petition's creator to monitor the process to help ensure that trolls do not try and fraudulently foul and insult the integrity of the petition process. To suggest otherwise is simply foolish.

Reply

IamGayle

2:37 pm on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Isn't the marquee supposed to be protected by the CHAP board?

Reply

Laura P

8:24 pm on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Barbara, the 2 posts from your "facebook friend" that I deleted were simply abusive personal attacks on Mr. Kiefaber and the FOTS that expressed the wish that we had died. This kind of abusive post cannot be tolerated under any circumstances. If you do not support the petition, do not sign it. That's quite simple.

Reply

IamGayle

5:33 pm on Monday, December 5, 2011

Crickets chirping.......
They grow so quiet when faced with facts. Batimore Observer has too been extremely abusive and only seems to be able to post information he's read in the mainstream media. He/she is simply that. An observer. A cyber stalker and cyber bully. he too made some pretty horrendous comments to me with regard to the "d" word. (death)

Reply

Barbara

6:28 pm on Monday, December 5, 2011

It's usually how everyone deals with the "friends" of the senator. It's much like talking to a whiny 5 year old. Eventually you just have to give up and ignore. I'm not sure what message Laura P is referring to regarding threats, but it is not the person that i'm referring to, and having dealt with you guys in the past he is not interested in getting involved - I did forward your invitation, Mr. Kiefaber. I can, however, speak for myself and I assure you that my message on the Friends of The Senator Theatre page had no threats. I am almost fifty years old and have never threatened anyone in my life.

My only question is this: When the citizens of Baltimore and beyond gave Mr. Kiefaber $109K... excuse me let me rephrase... Mr. Kiefaber only reported receiving $109K, which went directly to the bank. Why wasn't any of the money used to fix the things which you have admitted were wrong with the theatre (i.e. bad marquee wiring?)

Reply

Buzz Beeler

8:07 pm on Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Can't argue with that. Sad, especially the decade etchings in the famed sidewalk. A part of our history, hope we don't lose it.

I had a little part in that, not my hands but Mr. Frank Capra, Jr.'s and ZuZu from "It's a Wonderful Life."

Reply

Leave a comment