Readers Sound Off on Crime Cameras
See what Patch readers had to say about the database of surveillance cameras in Baltimore.
Patch asked readers if cameras made them feel safe.
Readers Comments
ralahinn1: No
k harris: no
Sean Tully: I don't feel particularly unsafe under normal circumstances, but if I am in a rough part of town, knowing cameras are around does not make me feel any safer. But, having said that, I do believe that cameras are contributing to a lowering of crime.
Brandon: no, they make me feel spied on.
baltochick: Nope. Watched yes, but not safer. And I don't believe they're an actual deterrent. Sure the crime on the corner one is pointed at "stops"....and then moves down the block. Plastering so called "unsafe" neighborhoods (read lower income) with cameras is demoralizing.
Christian: I think that this is a "feel good" measure with little benefits to the community in that more police added to the force would be a better resolution of the crime problems in this city. Who is going to monitor all these cameras? In our community we had these cameras placed on Greenmount Avenue and most were inoperable and we found out that no one was monitoring them. Creating a data base that does not function properly is another colossal waste of money and does not guarantee any success in the elimination of crime. However old fashioned policing in the streets of Baltimore, with the police actually walking their beat will make it a safer city. The police will get to know the community and the community will get to know the police and in time they will both cooperate with each other. This data base is just another level to be administered and one that could fail where police walking in the streets of the city is a way to get to know the neighborhood and respects the privacy of our residents.
Via Facebook:
Casey Jenkins The security cameras on Greenmount Ave haven't worked in the past six years and they were paid for by our special benefits district tax. Two years ago there was a murder on the corner of 33rd and Greenmount the camera was pointed at the exact location of the murder but the damn camera didn't work now you tell me are we safer with cameras
Via Twitter:
tffnyjones: no, they make me think there might be a better chance of catching the criminal after the fact.
ekapus: nope, because they're probably not being monitored.
Side_Alpha: not really a right to carry state would make everyone safer! Criminals don't buy guns legally
CitywideMSVP: Not at all!
Christian
8:57 am on Friday, July 20, 2012
Casey what do you expect from the Benefits District? The E.D. attends meetings at Central Baltimore on our time, is the E.D. of Charles Village Foundation on our dime and is busy telling the world that he is going to be the head of all of the Benefits District throughout the country because the Benefits District is central to the improvement of our neighborhood. My question to the entire community is, are we any safer than before the Benefits District was established? Does putting cameras all over the community make it any safer or does it just point out that there is considerable crime in the area? Just give us old fashioned police on the street, end the Benefits District to pay for them and there would be considerable crime improvement in our community.
JRO
9:31 am on Friday, July 20, 2012
The city installed a camera on a friend of mine's block. All it did was push the loiterers to another corner.
Aren't the cameras closed circuit? So, unless anybody happens to be watching at that moment, nobody is caught. I thought there was going to be a project to modernize the camera system?
Vivian Adelberg Rudow
10:59 am on Saturday, July 21, 2012
As many cameras as possible should be put in place. It's important!
Christian
6:02 pm on Saturday, July 21, 2012
There is no need for cameras all over the place and it is a colossal waste of taxpayers money putting them up. What it does is outline an area where the criminal element knows that crime exists, where there are less police available and opens up an area to additional crime. The issue before us is elimination of crime, not just moving crime from one area to another. It is neither fair or right to move the crime from one area to another so that another neighborhood has the problem. Wouldn't it be better to address the issue of crime by having suitable policing available for all communities? Why continue, as the Pastor of Ark Church in the Oliver Community said "to constantly do the same thing over and over again, why not resolve the problem?