Despite your obvious attempt at sarcasm, you are actually correct.

Consider this. A person with one black parent and one white parent would be welcome at a black organization, but not at a white organization. Why? This demonstrates perfectly how the white organization is racist in a way that the black organization is not.

"All white organizations are racists."

I have seen plenty of "anti-racists" say exactly that and these people are so bottom of the barrel, brain dead stupid, they don't see the irony of their own comments.

They say they are anti-racist, what they really are is anti-white. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

Look up "Americans faking hate crimes" and look up "Proof of Anti-white racism at the National Union of Journalists" on youtube. Racist means you are against the genocide of your own people. Whites don't want to lose their culture and want to promote it. You can't promote white culture with a mixed race couple. Racism is a social construct invented by Jews who divide and conquer over all races.

Jared Taylor DID attend the presentation. Go check with your freshman English teacher and find out why you just wrote that he didn't..

So when do you plan on giving all of America back to the Native Americans? Hypocrite.

"So when do you plan on giving all of America back to the Native Americans? Hypocrite."

It wasn't theirs to begin with.

1. According to the Solutrean Hypothesis, Ice Age Europeans pre-dated the Siberian migrants by 3-4000 years.
2. Regardless, it was White Europeans who settled and built America (and Canada). The Amerindians were barley into the copper age in 1492.
3. How exactly do you take land from a people who have no written language or laws, no concept of land ownership, and no idea geographically where they even are?
4. Idiot.

The 16th century British settlers of America were not given America by your hypothetical Solutreans, so the Solutrean hypothesis is irrelevant. Similarly, the details of Native American culture are irrelevant. All that matters is that when the British arrived in America, America was already inhabited by the Native Americans, but the British stayed anyway. Uncle Pen up there is a hypocrite because he complains about others following the British example, but not about the British example itself.

Let me guess: you support Israel too. Your "Solutrean" argument holds about as much water as their "Israelite" argument.

Whites were the first Americans. When are you going to round up all the Amerinds and send them back to Mongolia? Hypocrite.

When are you going to stop calling for the genocide of the White race?

Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-white.

Willn, In the americas early people were displaced by those who came after. its competition for scare resources. Whites lost temporarily. We're back!!!!!
We re-populated the Americas and have dealt very kindly with those who displaced us.
Now you are coming back with your war cry to try to displace Whites again from the Americas.
All you are doing is presenting an anti-white narrative as a form of warfare against the White race.
Since you don't want to live in peace with White people, maybe U should go back to Asia.
Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-white.

Strawman. I do not advocate displacement of anyone; I support everyone living wherever they want to live. You trolls from your racist forum are the ones who hold the double-standard of being fine with the British settlers moving to an America already inhabited by Native Americans but then complain about "non-whites" doing exactly the same thing.

Everything you say reduces to: "It's OK when 'white' people do it, but not OK when anyone else does it." Your calling me "anti-white" is no different from Zionists who call everyone "anti-Semite" who criticizes Israel.

Most of these blacks that comment to Mr. Taylor are Students at Historically Black (Seperatist & IMO Racist) Colleges so their arguments are not only very uneducated but also extremely Biggoted!!! Know the history before you present your racist rants Africans...Thank you!!!

I hope the nascent white movement on campuses won't fritter away its energy talking about white civil rights and such, when we face the much bigger concern of non-whites continuing to flood into our countries and ourselves continuing to be forced by law to integrate with them so as to be assimilated and blended out of existence.

That's the real threat...the genocidal extinction of the white race...and I hope the leaders of this nascent campus white movement will understand that, and will see abridgment of white civil rights and other anti-white injuries and insults as part of the larger anti-white program of white genocide.

Flooding and forced assimilation is called genocide when it's done in Tibet, and it should be called by its proper name in white countries also.

The goal is the extermination of the white race.

Remember this, white person: You are either a racist or a race traitor. Pick one.

The administration is bigoted against whites AND hate whites. That is why they deny whites equal access to a student union.

You are correct. The administration are morons with their discrimination and blocking white students from forming a union.

Hey JD, don't worry, diversity is becoming more and more evident in Towson. Why, just the other weekend Towson had a wonderful experience with a diverse crowd involving the Recher. Towson Mall has been a much safer and welcoming place since the clientele became more diverse. Apartmentland in Cockeysville has certainly benefited from the increased diversity of its residents. Yes, diversity has been terrific!

Hey JD, the property values around Morgan are really skyrocketing, aren't they?

actually they can erect a statue of your boy TRAYVON with his "hoodie" and the plaque can read 'MISUNDERSTOOD YOUF" I didn't do nuffin wrong i was just buyin skittles yo

HMMMM LIKE THE BLACK RACIST PANTHER PARTY BREAKING LAWS EVERYDAY....hmmmmmmmmmmmm the black version of the kkk

Probably a B.S.

Or, Black Supremacy (but , that would be OK of course).

yes you are right ghetto national park

Hey Lily. Seems to me that whites in have been getting their share of exploitation in recent years. Just a few examples: 1) Racial quotas are used in hiring and college acceptance rather than pure qualification. 2) Advertising increasingly shows the white male as being the most intellectually inferior in mixed race situations. 3) Black-on-white crimes that are blatantly motivated by racial hatred are rarely prosecuted as "hate crimes". There are many other examples promoted by our government as some sort of never-ending guilt trip over slavery, which was practiced by many other nations around the world, including many African nations.
Your argument that certain groups form to protect themselves from exploitation certainly applies to any group who feels exploited by these policies. If this group feels exploited and the need to form an organization, who are you to decide how they feel?
Regardless, I understand that the White Student Union would not be able to exclude any other race who wanted to join, so, that argument goes out the window.
If some faculty person has the guts to stand up to University and peer pressure and guide this group, they may actually have a positive influence on those who feel exploited by these reactionary policies.

"To accept this group is to deny injustice".

No, to deny this group is to accept injustice.

For someone accusing others of poor education, making illogical "arguements"(sic) and being "privilaged"(sic), you really ought to look in the mirror.

Last time I checked we still live in a democracy, my dear, and White students are entitled to the same rights than any other group regardless of the "reasons", and moreover your personal self-hatred or open racism against them. As long as this group is not breaking any rules, there is no "logical argument" to not accept it.

By the way, it is also hilarious that you don't want Whites to be allowed as a group while identifying them specifically as a group when it comes to your perceived "exploitation" and "privilege". Oh the irony...

Hypocrite !

As a group Whites make up about 7% of the world’s population. In spite of this, all white countries from Australia to America to Europe are being relentlessly targeted for massive non-white immigration, complete with “hate crime” and “hate speech” laws to stifle any opposition to this genocidal policy aimed against Whites.

And you have the nerve to state that “Whites are not remotely threatened as a group”?!

What you are is an anti-White hypocrite.

What about the NAACP? They are a group that only supports people of "color". Isn't that exactly what you are talking about? A group that is for promoting, supporting and "advancing" people of color (i,e, based on the race of the person) isn't racist, but a group that does the same based on whiteness is? That's ridiculous.

All of this is moot. People should be able to associate with whomever they wish. Schools should only accept students based on merit. People should have the right to form any group they want (whether you, or I, like it or not). It's that old pesky freedom thing that gets in the way of all your arguments.

I find most Americans agree with freedom, as long as the opinions being expressed are in line with what they believe. If they aren't, then people believe those opinions should be silenced and eradicated. Most Americans are hypocritical simpletons who don't understand, or deserve, freedom.

hmmmm so what happens when these so called minority groups become the majority....oh that's right it's justice and all the wars and hatin will stop because blacks and latinos and asians get along so well riiiiiight

“She is not the one identifying "whites" specifically as a group.”

Actually, she specifically made the false assertion that “Whites are not remotely threatened as a group.” You seemed to have missed that part.

“It was the Jim Crow Laws that did that explicitly in their demand for segregation.”

Do you even know why the Jim Crow laws were enacted? To protect whites from black criminal behavior, that’s why.

“Why can't we simply all be Americans?”

Why don’t you try asking the National Black Congress, or better yet The National Organization Of La Raza (The Race) that? Wasn’t that the idea of the ‘Great Society’?

Now, some 50+ years and billions (trillions?) of dollars later, blacks are still just as feral, still as welfare dependent, with even higher drop-out and unemployment rates than ever. Obviously integration has been a spectacular and costly failure.

“Whatever identities we use should be ones that encourage integration, not segregation.”

What good has the last 50+ years of integration done for whites? I have no desire to ‘integrate’ with hostile non-whites who clearly hate us. I believe that White people have a right to survive, as does every race. Integration, and hence assimilation is simply another form of genocide.

Better to use the term "self-determination" than segregation because segregation has a lot of anti-white bias built into it. People can separate along common elements, race or interest. Why is that not okay? Why do you want to suppress natural inclinations of Whites to unite as White people? Integration is another value not supported by nature. Its part of your anti-white value system that gives more value to an ideology rather than loyalty to people, that is flesh and blood.
That's how psychopaths prosper in this world, convert people from loyalty to their group and the peace and security that brings into loyalty to an idea.
You are a despicable anti-white. Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-white.

"she specifically made the false assertion that “Whites are not remotely threatened as a group.” "

The assertion is not false. You are only threatened as a group if others deny you the freedom to dissociate from that group even if you want to. That has never been the case for white people. It is black people who have historically wanted to be judged as individuals but faced white people who viewed them not as individuals but as members of a "black" group.

"Do you even know why the Jim Crow laws were enacted? To protect whites from black criminal behavior"

This is a perfect example of what I am saying. Under Jim Crow, innocent until proven guilty did not apply to black people, because the system did not see them as individuals but as a group. This is what it means to be threatened as a group.

"Why don’t you try asking the National Black Congress"

See my earlier comment (third one down). The National Black Congress accepts partially black people as black. It is white organizations which refuse to accept partially white people as white. Therefore the National Black Congress will increasingly unite Americans as we become mixed, whereas white organizations try to divide Americans as we become mixed.

"What good has the last 50+ years of integration done for whites?"

That's like asking: what good has giving women the vote done for men? It's about fairness. Judging people by color (or gender) is unfair because nobody chooses what color (or gender) they are.

"People can separate along common elements, race or interest. Why is that not okay?"

Because race is not something we choose. To prohibit someone from joining a group because of race is to punish him for something he had no control over.

I should ask you: what is wrong with judging people by the content of their character?

Skeptic,
Horse sh*t. Whites are threatened with extinction in a few generations unless freedom of association is restored to White people. White genocide TODAY trumps any allegations from the distant past.

When we have: Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White Countries for Everybody, what do we have overtime?

We have solid Black only and Solid Asian only countries, exclusively for Blacks and Asians, based upon exclusive genetics and culture. Culture is respected and so tolerable to these groups. They do not need to tolerate massive inflows of invaders and made to tolerate foreign cultures.

We have more and more non-whites in White countries since the right of Whites to exclusive territory is denied them.

We have fewer and fewer White people.

How is this not White genocide?

Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-white.

When we mix more non-whites and fewer Whites in the same living space, what do we get?

In time, White extinction. Its called White genocide because this does not happen by chance. It is being forced upon Whites just like a rapist does not take no for an answer.

How is this not so? How is this not White genocide?

Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-white.

@Skeptic

"The assertion is not false. You are only threatened as a group if others deny you the freedom to dissociate from that group even if you want to. That has never been the case for white people."

Freedom to dissociate was exactly what was denied to Whites through anti-discrimination laws, affirmative action, race based quotas, forced school integration, and Section 8 housing among other things. Paid for mainly by Whites I might add.

"Therefore the National Black Congress will increasingly unite Americans as we become mixed..."

So in other words, your idea of unity is to mongrelize the White race out of existence so we can all be one. In other words, White genocide.

"Because race is not something we choose."

'Race is not something we choose' is no excuse for White genocide.

'Prohibiting someone from joining a group' is no excuse for White genocide.

'Judging people by color or gender is unfair' is no excuse for White genocide.

Why are you an advocate for White genocide?

p.s. If you want to do some "character content" judging, then click on the link a few posts down, watch the video, and note the obnoxious and idiotic behavior of the black "students".

George, you did not bother to address my points. You are just copying and pasting your mantra yet again. You are behaving like a parrot.

There are no countries exclusively for blood type A people. There are no countries exclusively for short-sighted people. There are no countries exclusively for people who can roll their tongues. What would you think if all these people suddenly started complaining about genocide? Would you laugh at them? That is why I laugh at you.

WIllN already owned you above on the Native American topic, so let's talk about some other groups, such as the Aboriginal Australians and the Maoris of New Zealand. Don't they have to tolerate foreign culture on what used to be their territory? So why do you not ask for Australia and New Zealand to be returned to them?

Skeptic, you comments of course are ridiculous. The White race is a reality which you want to deny so you can justify White genocide. You have many anti-white narratives as arrows in your bag of weapons.

When we have: Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White Countries for Everybody, what do we have overtime? We have fewer White people. We have more non-white people in White countries.
When we add integration laws and coerced tolerance we have more an more assimilation which in the end means the extinction of the White race.

How is this not so?

Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-white.

Of all the anti-whites I've mean, I've found nothing that can deter them from being pro-white genocide. I'm still looking for a magic bullet.
Maybe you are bullet proof.

Google the name "Bill Riccio", people. That's all you need to know about Taylor's support base.

Anti-racists don't need codewords.

I am going to guess you are one of the few white guys on this board not making at least $150,000 a year.

mickey, I am sorry it didn't work out for you like it did the rest of us. When I was in prep school it was clear to me and the rest of my peers we were destined for financial services. College, MBA, series 7, 9, 10 exams. Now we are a bunch of middle age white guys with families and vacation homes and guess what. Its obvious it was all pretty damn easy.

If you think someone with different colored skin kept you down...well, it is a lie.

When your argument is that everyone else is as bad as you, you have lost.

Kaba, it proves a double standard and that those who condemn Whites are just anti-white. Its not possible to measure who is worse. its sufficient to see the double standard and call anti-whites on it. That's a good label for them, anti-white.
Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-white.

You make me want to weep, weep more for the ongoing genocide of the White race.
Respect all, but blend Whites out of existence? That's genocide.
When you force upon a declining white race (whites are not having enough babies to replace themselves), massive numbers of non-whites, to share the same homeland/living space, the end result is the elimination of the declining white race. Its inevitable.

The White race is declining wile non-white races are rising. The causes could be explored. Instead we merely have approval and justifying of this White genocide.
We could ask how can we reverse this trend so Whites can continue to occupy traditional White homelands and not be replaced by non-whites couldn't we?
Why is it not part of social discourse?

When we have: Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White Countries for Everybody, what do we have overtime? No White people.

You are so right.

That's a loaded question. I am against all human rights violations in principle.
The whole issue of slavery needs to be explored. The way you have phrased the question implies that Whites are the guilty ones. Whites have been the victims of slavery as much as any race. The slave industry is still alive and well although White civilization has worked hard to eliminate it. has any other race tried to eliminate slavery?
As an industry, we should look at the brokers, ship owners, financiers, and the plantation owners, not the middle of the rode White man who may have been indentured or a wage slave. Today the big guys, descendants of those who profited by this industry are the anti-white global elites.
But the average White guy has been scapegoated and blamed for the abuses. White guilt is all about this as support for the ongoing genocide of the White race.
Anti-racists, as you said, because they have the supreme codeword, the R word, proving they are just anti-white.
You seem to be very comfortable with being an accomplice to genocide. Now that's anti-racist for you.

“As an industry, we should look at the brokers, ship owners, financiers, and the plantation owners, not the middle of the rode White man who may have been indentured or a wage slave.”

Not to mention the Arabs who worked as middle men (as they had for centuries), along with the numerous African chieftains who were all too happy to raid, kidnap, and sell their own people into slavery. The trans-Atlantic slave trade would have been impossible without their help and co-operation.

“The slave industry is still alive and well although White civilization has worked hard to eliminate it.”

Still thriving in parts of Africa, interestingly enough.

Just a few inconvenient facts the anti-Whites forget to mention when they try to regurgitate the 200+ year guilt trip of slavery.

Winston Jack, yes. They do confirm the observation that "Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-white."
When a person hates White people, that person needs to distort history to put White people in an unfairly bad light.
And of course they want to blame White people today who had nothing what so ever to do with the accusation. Even those White people who had ancestors that were slaves or indentured servants.

HAHA...Jews were the biggest slave traders in existence and also slave owners in this country...GOOGLE ISREAL COHEN 1912 and you will realize what these animals are doing to our race...it's written in plain black and white!!!

So you are not an anti-racist? You don't assault Whites with the R world when you want to feel self-righteous? You don't have the need to do so?
I would like to follow you around if I could to be sure you are not an anti-racist.
When people try to block the White genocide message I always wonder of they are doing that because they are just anti-white.
They do you think people stand in the why of the White genocide message?

To be Black and be proud is sort of holy and sacred. To be White and be proud is a grave sin, sure to be met with the slur "anazikkkracistwhowantstokillsixmillionjews."

This hypocrisy needs end.