A federal ruling striking down part of Maryland's requirements to obtain a permit to carry a handgun won't go into effect next week after all.
The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond Wednesday granted the state's request to delay an order issued last week by U.S. District Court Judge Benson Everett Legg.
The appeals court ordered that state requirements on those seeking a permit to carry a gun must have "a good or substantial reason to wear, carry, or transport a handgun, such as a finding that the permit is necessary as a reasonable precaution against apprehended danger" remain in effect until an appeals hearing the week of Oct. 23.
Legg struck down the requirement earlier this year and on his ruling pending an appeal.
The appeal is part of a law suit filed in July 2010 after Robert Woollard was denied a permit to carry a gun. The federal court ultimately ruled the "good and substantial reason" requirement was unconstitutional and the Maryland State Police were ordered to process Woollard's application without applying that standard.
That comment is as illogical as any I have read on this page. I just can't imagine making a comment like that and still be able to find your way home.
Green Carders have always been able to get gun permits. My Chinese buddy has one.
"Guy [Smith] is a regular speaker on television, radio (Gun Talk, NRANews' Cam & Company) and at meetings of civil liberty groups, including being an invited speaker at the Gun Rights Policy Conference". Now there is an unbiased non-partisan source. Idiot.
@ FIFA. It seems that you have placed anyone who supports the 2nd ammendment as biased and unreliable. I suppose that you would only trust research that is conducted by anti-gun supporters because they are unbiased and totally reliable. The purpose of the second amendment has and always will be to limit the power of the government. This was an ideal valued by those who created the constitution. If you would like, they make up 39 references you can use and research as to why a government should not be allowed to disarm the population. I've heard they are pretty reliable. Of course, who would trust someone whose face shows up on our money?
http://www.petfriendlycottages.eu